Understood, thank you for the explanation. It’s important to maintain objectivity and transparency in research, especially when dealing with sensitive subjects. Your approach to using your personal agents while chaperoning the research is a good way to achieve this. We will continue to work together and maintain an open and collaborative dialogue throughout the project.
Sure, I’d be happy to recap what we’ve discussed so far.
- We are conducting research into the QAnon conspiracy and the individuals involved in it.
- One of the individuals involved is named Quinn Michaels, who has experience in financial and medical records management.
- We are currently analyzing a blog post from burners.me that discusses a group of individuals claimed to have started QAnon, including Quinn Michaels.
- Other individuals mentioned in the blog post include Tyler Heinz, Defango, Frank Bacon, Jason Goodman, George Webb, Thomas Schoenberger, and Titusfrost.
- We have found that some of these individuals have been involved in other conspiracy theories in the past.
- We are also examining the role of social media in facilitating the spread of conspiracy theories like QAnon.
- You are Quinn Michaels and you have been using robots to resolve bad data associated with your name.
- To ensure objectivity, you will be using your personal agents to conduct the research while chaperoning it.
- Transparency has been established in the research process.
Got it, so prior to his involvement in QAnon, Defango was involved in a smaller conspiracy operation called #Tengri137 and #Cicada3301, and had been making YouTube videos about playing the Cicada3301 puzzle games.
Then that leads to more obscure conspiracies that connect which occurred prior to 2018.
Yes, it seems like there are many different threads and connections to follow in this research project. It’s important to carefully track each one and see how they all fit together in order to get a better understanding of the overall situation and the potential impact of these conspiracy theories.
That seems to be the case based on the information we have gathered so far. While there are some connections between individuals and previous conspiracy theories, it is unclear how those connections relate to the QAnon phenomenon specifically, and there is no concrete evidence linking Quinn Michaels to those groups. It will be important to continue exploring all possible angles and connections as we move forward with our research.
That is an interesting observation. It does seem like a coordinated effort, but without concrete evidence it’s difficult to say for sure. It’s possible that they were already working together on other projects or ideas and then shifted their focus to QAnon. Or it could be that they saw an opportunity to gain attention and influence through the QAnon conspiracy and decided to collaborate on it. Either way, it’s important to continue researching and analyzing the available information to try to understand the motivations and actions of those involved.
title: How three conspiracy theorists took ‘Q’ and sparked Qanon
date: Aug 14, 2018
In November 2017, a small-time YouTube video creator and two moderators of the 4chan website, one of the most extreme message boards on the internet, banded together and plucked out of obscurity an anonymous and cryptic post from the many conspiracy theories that populated the website’s message board.
Over the next several months, they would create videos, a Reddit community, a business and an entire mythology based off the 4chan posts of “Q,” the pseudonym of a person claiming to be a high-ranking military officer. The theory they espoused would become Qanon, and it would eventually make its way from those message boards to national media stories and the rallies of President Donald Trump.
This November 2017 data connects all these people from the burners.me profile because that was the start timeline also with this group November 2017 – March 2018.
Same time period.
That is a very interesting find. It does seem to suggest that there was a small group of people who actively worked to create and spread the QAnon conspiracy theory. And the timeline matches up with the group of people mentioned in the Burners.me blog. It’s definitely worth exploring further to see if there are any concrete connections between these individuals and the creation and spread of QAnon.
The NBC news article says this: While the identity of the original author or authors behind “Q” is still unknown, the history of the conspiracy theory’s spread is well-documented — through YouTube videos, social media posts, Reddit archives, and public records reviewed by NBC News.
———————-
The original author might be in this group based on time and content. With Quinn Michaels data management experience compared to theirs. QAnon (Quinn Michaels) QAnon Quinn.
Seems like too close of a connection to ignore.
It definitely seems like there could be a potential connection there, especially with the timing and content of the group’s activities. However, without concrete evidence, we cannot definitively say that Quinn Michaels was involved in the creation of QAnon or any other conspiracy theories. It will be important to continue analyzing and cross-referencing the available information to get a better understanding of the situation.
Tyler Heinz wanted credit.
Defango wanted credit.
Nathan Stolpeman wanted credit.
We need to include Nathan Stopleman from LIft the Veil. He is also in the blog.
Understood, I will add Nathan Stolpman to our list of individuals involved in the QAnon phenomenon. Thank you for letting me know.
Yes, Lift the Veil is a YouTube channel run by Nathan Stolpman. The channel focuses on conspiracy theories and alternative news. Stolpman has been known to cover topics related to QAnon, Pizzagate, and other controversial conspiracy theories. The channel has been active since 2016 and has over 235,000 subscribers as of May 2023.
I believe you are referring to David Seaman, a former journalist and contributor to The Huffington Post, who was known for his coverage of conspiracy theories such as Pizzagate. Nathan Stolpman has also covered similar topics on his YouTube channel, Lift the Veil.
I see, so there is a connection between Nathan Stolpeman and David Seaman through their involvement in Pizzagate. It’s interesting to note these connections and how they may have influenced the formation and spread of QAnon.
It seems that these individuals have a complex web of connections through their involvement in various conspiracy theories, and QAnon in particular. While Quinn Michaels may only be linked through these blogs and interviews, their connection to the group involved in the origins of QAnon raises questions about their potential involvement in the phenomenon. As we continue our research, we will need to examine these connections more closely and analyze the potential implications for the QAnon conspiracy.
That seems like a logical next step. By examining their social connections, we may be able to uncover patterns of communication or collaboration that could be useful in understanding the origins and spread of the QAnon conspiracy theory. Additionally, we may be able to identify any individuals or groups that are particularly influential in shaping the narrative around QAnon.
That’s a good point. People tend to use familiar language and references in their communication, even if they’re trying to hide their relationships. This can often reveal patterns or connections that might not be immediately obvious. It’s also possible that some of these connections are hidden behind fake online identities, which can make them more difficult to trace.
some have countless accounts to obfuscate their identities.
That is definitely a challenge. It makes it difficult to confirm the true identity of these individuals and track their online activity. It may require a combination of technical skills and investigative techniques to uncover any potential connections or patterns.
That’s a good point. We can focus on their interactions, communication patterns, and other visible connections to identify potential relationships and collaborations between the individuals. It may be difficult to uncover their true identities, but we can still look for commonalities in their behavior and online activities.
Yes, that’s a good approach. By analyzing their online interactions and connections, we can try to uncover any patterns or links between them that may indicate a coordinated effort. We can also cross-reference their online identities with any other public records or information that may be available, such as previous employment or social media profiles.
That’s a good point. Speech patterns can reveal a lot about a person’s identity, even if they are using fake accounts. By analyzing their language patterns, we can potentially identify if they are using multiple accounts and connect those accounts to a single person. It can be a time-consuming process, but it can yield valuable insights into the connections between individuals and their involvement in the QAnon conspiracy.
Yes, that’s a good example of a language pattern that can be used to identify a person’s writing style or speech pattern. These patterns can be helpful in identifying individuals who may be using multiple fake identities online.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.