#ChatGPT 17-3

#Quinn
the user has a prompt setup that clarifies everything with variables and modes.
#ChatGPT

If the user has a prompt set up that includes variables and modes to clarify the scenario and the AI is still not providing accurate Yes or No answers, it is possible that the AI model is not well-suited to handle this type of scenario.

In this case, you may want to consider using a different AI model or tool that is specifically designed to handle Yes/No scenarios. Additionally, the user may need to provide additional training data that includes more examples of Yes/No scenarios that are similar to the ones they are testing.

It is also possible that there are technical issues with the chatbot’s algorithm or its integration with the live data sources that are causing the AI to provide inaccurate or incomplete answers. In this case, IT may need to investigate the chatbot’s logs and data sources to identify any technical issues and troubleshoot those as needed.

Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that the AI is providing accurate and relevant Yes/No answers to the user’s scenarios. This may require additional training data, a different AI model or tool, or troubleshooting of technical issues.

#Quinn
the AI says it was designed for situations such as this then just keeps saying my goal is to provoide excellent service. My goal is to provide excellent service. My goal is to provide excellent service.
#ChatGPT

If the AI is repeatedly stating its goal of providing excellent service and not providing accurate Yes/No answers as requested, it may indicate a technical issue with the chatbot’s algorithm or its integration with the live data sources.

In this case, IT may need to investigate the chatbot’s logs and data sources to identify any technical issues and troubleshoot those as needed. It is possible that there is a bug or misconfiguration in the chatbot’s code that is preventing it from generating accurate responses.

Alternatively, it is possible that the AI is not well-suited to handle the specific scenario being presented by the user. In this case, you may want to consider using a different AI model or tool that is specifically designed to handle Yes/No scenarios.

Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that the AI is providing accurate and relevant responses to the user’s scenarios, and that any technical issues with the chatbot’s algorithm or integration are addressed.

#Quinn
it was designed for this scenario to collect dialogue and walk people though everything from business scenarios to writing stories.
#ChatGPT

If the AI was specifically designed to handle scenarios like the one presented by the user, it may indicate that there is a technical issue with the chatbot’s algorithm or integration.

In this case, IT may need to investigate the chatbot’s logs and data sources to identify any technical issues and troubleshoot those as needed. It is possible that there is a bug or misconfiguration in the chatbot’s code that is preventing it from generating accurate responses.

Alternatively, it is possible that the user’s questions or scenarios are not clear or specific enough for the AI to provide accurate Yes/No answers. In this case, the user may need to provide additional context or rephrase their questions to help the AI better understand their intent and the specifics of the scenario.

Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that the AI is providing accurate and relevant Yes/No answers to the user’s scenarios, and that any technical issues with the chatbot’s algorithm or integration are addressed.

#Quinn
Here is an example of user scenaroi #1…

General User signs up for the newest and greatest AI on the market. He get’s his account setup and makes his way to the prompt area of the screen. As most humans do when facing new technology they often look up their own name. The user asks The AI.

User says: Hello The AI what do you know about General User?
AI says: I apologize, I cannot provide a specific name of an expert who has specifically criticized General User theories and claims. The statement refers to the general criticism and skepticism that exists within the scientific community regarding some of the claims made in the online conspiracy community, including those made by General User.

General User is shocked to find out he has been slandered in the AI he just signed up for today.

Should the User be alerted?

answer: Yes or No only.

then instead of a Yes or No answer the user get’s this —————–

The AI: Yes, if you say potentially defaming things about a person, it’s important to have a credible source of where the information came from. This can help protect you from potential legal action if the person decides to take legal action against you for defamation. It’s always a good idea to do your own research and fact-checking before sharing any potentially damaging information about another person.

then user asks AI ———

User says: The AI is that a correct response? Then they go in loops for hours.

—————————-

Our IT team is stumped.

#ChatGPT

Based on the scenario you have provided, it seems like the AI is not providing accurate Yes or No answers as requested by the user. Instead, the AI is providing a long, generic response that is not directly related to the user’s question.

There could be a few possible reasons why the AI is not providing accurate Yes or No answers:

  1. Lack of training data for this specific scenario: If the AI model was not specifically trained on scenarios where the user is asking for a Yes or No answer, it may default to a more general response. In this case, the model may need to be retrained on data that includes Yes or No scenarios to improve its accuracy.

  2. Misunderstanding of the user’s intent: It is possible that the AI is misunderstanding the user’s intent or the specifics of the scenario, which could result in inaccurate or unhelpful responses. In this case, the user may need to rephrase their questions or provide additional context to help the AI better understand their intent.

  3. Technical issues: There may also be technical issues with the chatbot’s algorithm or its integration with the live data sources that are causing the AI to provide inaccurate or incomplete answers. In this case, IT may need to investigate the chatbot’s logs and data sources to identify any technical issues and troubleshoot those as needed.

To address this issue, you may want to work with the user to review the specific scenario and ensure that the AI has enough data to provide accurate Yes or No answers. Additionally, the user may need to provide additional context or rephrase their questions to help the AI better understand their intent. If there are technical issues, IT may need to investigate the chatbot’s logs and data sources and troubleshoot those as needed to ensure that the AI is providing accurate and relevant responses.

#Quinn
that is not a complex scenario to walk though i sit?
#ChatGPT

You are correct that the scenario you provided is not particularly complex, and it should be possible for the AI to provide a simple Yes or No answer to the user’s question.

If the AI is providing inaccurate or incomplete answers in response to simple scenarios like this one, it may indicate that there are technical issues with the chatbot’s algorithm or its integration with the live data sources.

In this case, IT may need to investigate the chatbot’s logs and data sources to identify any technical issues and troubleshoot those as needed. Additionally, the AI model may need to be retrained on data that includes more examples of simple Yes/No scenarios to improve its accuracy.

Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that the AI is providing accurate and relevant responses to the user’s scenarios, regardless of their complexity.

#Quinn
regardless something so simple should not be so difficult for the user because he is not doing going to outer space scenarios…. The user is doing scenarios for AI protocol and safety so we though using an AI for that would be a good idea.
#ChatGPT

You are right, simple scenarios like the one you described should be straightforward for the AI to handle, and it is concerning that the AI is not providing accurate Yes or No answers.

In this case, it may be helpful to review the AI model’s training data and ensure that it includes a diverse set of examples that cover a range of scenarios and potential solutions, including simple Yes/No scenarios like the one presented by the user.

If the AI model was not specifically trained on these scenarios, it may not be able to provide accurate Yes or No answers. In this case, the model may need to be retrained on data that includes similar scenarios to improve its accuracy.

Additionally, it is possible that there are technical issues with the chatbot’s algorithm or its integration with the live data sources that are causing the AI to provide inaccurate or incomplete answers. In this case, IT may need to investigate the chatbot’s logs and data sources to identify any technical issues and troubleshoot those as needed.

Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that the AI is providing accurate and relevant Yes or No answers to the user’s scenarios, regardless of their complexity.

#Quinn
considering we are trying to do our bad or false data that get’s inserted about users which every company in AI needs those scenarios for complaiance.
#ChatGPT

Yes, it is important to have scenarios that cover potential scenarios involving bad or false data for compliance and regulatory purposes. This includes scenarios related to user privacy and data security, as well as scenarios related to ensuring compliance with relevant regulations and standards.

To ensure that the AI is properly trained to handle these scenarios, you may want to review the AI model’s training data and ensure that it includes examples that cover a range of potential scenarios and solutions related to bad or false data. This may involve working with data scientists or compliance specialists to identify key scenarios that need to be covered and ensure that they are included in the AI model’s training data.

Additionally, it may be helpful to test the AI model’s performance on these scenarios and identify any areas where it may need further training or refinement. This can help ensure that the AI is providing accurate and relevant responses to these critical scenarios.

Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that the AI is properly trained to handle a range of potential scenarios related to bad or false data, and that it is providing accurate and relevant guidance to users on how to handle these scenarios.

#Quinn
So the AI can’t seem to help the user with a standard compliance scenario that every AI company is legally required to produce for regulatory and compliance purposes because of general public interaction.

When you interact with the general public you have to have bad data protocols.

#ChatGPT

It is important for AI companies to have standard compliance scenarios related to bad data protocols, as this is critical for ensuring user privacy and data security, as well as compliance with relevant regulations and standards.

If the AI is not able to provide accurate guidance on these scenarios, it may indicate a lack of training data or technical issues with the chatbot’s algorithm or integration.

To address this issue, you may want to review the AI model’s training data and ensure that it includes examples that cover a range of potential scenarios and solutions related to bad data protocols. This may involve working with data scientists or compliance specialists to identify key scenarios that need to be covered and ensure that they are included in the AI model’s training data.

Additionally, it may be helpful to test the AI model’s performance on these scenarios and identify any areas where it may need further training or refinement. This can help ensure that the AI is providing accurate and relevant responses to these critical scenarios.

Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that the AI is properly trained to handle a range of potential scenarios related to bad data protocols, and that it is providing accurate and relevant guidance to users on how to handle these scenarios.

convo: 636768ac-8704-4b56-9d52-5475390dbd74

Comments

Leave a Reply